A bit of nonsense in terms of interpretation, yet this cleanlypolices up the observational data to a high quality. The originalwork came out over fifty years ago and has now been thoroughlyconfirmed. The only thing missing is interpretive imagination.
To that end, the moon conforms nicely to an asteroid moved from theasteroid belt to low Mars orbit through the expedience of ejectinginternal mass out through the apparent nozzle at the end. We coulddo this. The asteroid is now hollow and an ideal location for aspinning space habitat holding a huge potential population. Thatpopulation would reside in a huge suspension cabled Dyson Spherewith living layers like an onion and could plausibly exceed100,000,000.
The asteroid would provide the massive shielding needed in space.
As conjectured in earlier posts, the population is likely human andpart of the evacuation ahead of the the Pleistocene Nonconformity of13900 BP.
Phobos, the Martian moon is artificial claims European SpaceAgency
http://realityzone-realityzone.blogspot.ca/2010/06/european-space-agency-mars-moon-phobos.html
Theprestigious European Space Agency (ESA) has declared Phobos, themysterious Martian moon, to be artificial. At least one-third of itis hollow and its origin is not natural, but alien in nature. The ESAis Europe's counterpart to NASA. Could this revelation motivate NASAto release the secrets it's harboring? Don't count on it…If itsartificial an alien civilization put it there. Proven right: Dr.Iosif Samuilovich Shklovsky Phobos first believed artificial byfamous astrophysicist Astrophysicist Dr. Iosif Samuilovich Shklovskyfirst calculated the orbital motion of the Martian satellite Phobos.He came to the inescapable conclusion that the moon is artificial andhollow--basically a titanic spaceship.
TheRussian astronomer, Dr. Cherman Struve, spent months calculating thetwo Martian moons' orbits with extreme accuracy during the early 20thCentury. Studying the astronomer's notes, Shklovsky realized as theyears progressed into decades Phobos's orbital velocity and positionno longer matched Struve's mathematically predicted position.
Afterlengthy study of the tidal, gravitic, and magnetic forces, Shklovskycame to the firm conclusion that, “ Nonatural causes could account for the origins of the two odd moons ortheir bizarre behavior, particularly that exhibited by Phobos. Themoons were artificial. Someone or something built them.
Duringan interview about the mysterious Martian moon Shklovskyexplained: "There'sonly one way in which the requirements of coherence, constancy ofshape of Phobos, and its extremely small average density can bereconciled. We must assume that Phobos is a hollow, empty body,resembling an empty tin can."
Fordecades most of mainstream science ignored Shklovsky's breakthroughwork, until the ESA began to take a closer look at the odd littlemoon.
ESAstudy declares Phobos not natural.
TheESA study abstract that appeared in the peer-reviewed GeophysicalResearch Letters revealsthat Phobos is not what many astrophysicists and astronomers believedfor generations: a captured asteroid.
"Wereport independent results from two subgroups of the Mars ExpressRadio Science (MaRS) team who independently analyzed Mars Express(MEX) radio tracking data for the purpose of determining consistentlythe gravitational attraction of the moon Phobos on the MEXspacecraft, and hence the mass of Phobos.New values for the gravitational parameter (GM=0.7127 ± 0.0021 x10-³ km³/s²) and density of Phobos (1876 ± 20 kg/m³) providemeaningful new constraints on the corresponding range of the body'sporosity (30% ± 5%), provide a basis for improved interpretation ofthe internal structure. We conclude that the interior of Phoboslikely contains large voids. When applied to various hypothesesbearing on the origin of Phobos, these results are inconsistent withthe proposition that Phobos is a captured asteroid."
CaseyKazan writes in ESA:Mars Moon Phobos 'Artificial,' that"…theofficial ESA Phobos website contained explicit scientific data, frommultiple perspectives, which strongly 'supported the idea that thisis what radar echoes would look like, coming back from inside 'ahuge…geometric… hollow spaceship'.In fact, they were the primary source of the decidedly 'internal, 3-Dgeometric-looking' radar signature. The concurrence of all three ofthese independent Mars Express experiments- 'imaging,' 'internal massdistribution,' (tracking) and 'internal radar imaging' now agreedthat 'the interior of Phobos' is partially hollow with internal,geometric 'voids' inside it.' Meaning that Phobos is artificial."
Inother words, Phobos is not a natural satellite, is not a "capturedasteroid," and is hollow. This is exactly what Dr. Shklovskyfound back in the 1960s. Phobos was artificially constructed andplaced into Martian orbit by...what?
Phobos:what is it?
Datareveals Phobos is not natural. As of now there isn't enoughinformation to discover exactly what the Martian moon is, but thereare several intriguing possibilities.1.It's a gigantic spaceship possibly built as an orbiting station orspace observatory.2.It's a generation starship that arrived from another star system andwas placed in parking orbit around Mars.3.It was being built in Mars orbit for insterstellar travel but wasnever completed.Afourth possibility is more ominous and deeply disturbing.
- It is a functional (or non-functional) gargantuan planet-killing space bomb, perhaps left over from some interplanetary space conflict millions of years in the past. (Some researchers are actually proposing this hypothesis.) Alien ship, super-bomb, or uncompleted project?
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder