8 Aralık 2012 Cumartesi

Inconvenient Arctic Observations Before Satellites

To contact us Click HERE




Theone aspect of present climate punditry that has been a skeleton inthe closet has been a decided inattention to the Arctic's historicalrecord as we have it before the advent of sat elites. This item is asmall step to remedy all that.
Thepoint is that warming in the Arctic appears to come in sustainedsurges that last several years before reversion to the naturalaverage.
Theimportant question that remains unanswered is whether any of itrepresents compelling trend lines outside the expected recovery fromthe little ice age and even that may be just an excessive pulse thattook decades to recover from.
Wehave identified the Antarctic maximum as a plausible pulse producingsource of cold water into the Atlantic basin which would naturallyaccelerate the removal of warmer surface waters.
You’ll BeAmazed By What Was Observed” – Inconvenient Arctic ObservationsBefore Satellite Measurements
By PGosselin on 22. November 2012
http://notrickszone.com/2012/11/22/youll-be-amazed-by-what-was-observed-inconvenient-arctic-observations-before-satellite-measurements/

Die kalteSonne website has another report about the Arctic. It presents achronology showing that really nothing unusual is happening today.You’ll find it below translated in English.
US submarine“Skate” at the North Pole in August, 1958. ”Hey, where’sthe ice!”  US Navy photo. Source: Wikipedia.org/history.

 ===========================================
We’veseen it once already – Arctic sea ice melting happened in the firsthalf of the 20th century
By Dr. Sebastian Lüning and Prof. FritzVahrenholt

When one hears orreads the reports about the Arctic sea ice, it helps to rememberthat satellite measurement did not begin until 1979. Thus we havedata only for a period of just over 30 years. This barely suffices tofulfil the gladly used “climate definition” of a minimum periodof 30 years. So we can’t avoid having a suspicious feeling, aswe ask what did the sea ice do before satellite measurement began?Can we just simply skip over this and simply add the notation that wejust don’t know much about it? Of course not. That would be tooeasy. Before the days of satellite measurement, ships travelled inthe Arctic and brought back information about sea ice cover in theregion.
In the followingchronology, we present some of these reports. You’ll be amazed bywhat was observed.1907 The New YorkTimes reported on an Arctic heat wave. Source: RealScience.
1922 ThePittsburgh Press: “Extraordinary warmth in the Arctic during thelast few years. Polar ice sheet to melt down? “Source: RealScience, The Mail.
1923 Fishermen,seal hunters and explorers report on unusually high temperaturesaround Spitzbergen and the East Arctic Ocean. The Daily News fromPerth speculated on whether the sea ice in the Arctic Ocean wouldsoon melt away as a result of a “radical climatechange”. Source: Real Science.
1935 Russianvessel travelled over ice-free region that today was stillice-covered just before the previous ice minimum in2007. Source: Real Science.
1938 Huge melting of Arctic sea ice. Source: WUWT.
Arctic temperatures inthe 1930s were warmer and the warming rate was higher than the rateseen at the end of the 20th century. Source: The Hockeyschtick.
At the end of the1930s, Soviet scientists noticed that for an extended time period iteven had been 6°C warmer than during the Nansens ice drift, and afew degrees warmer than today.Source: Donner + Doria.
1940 According toreports, Arctic sea ice in February 1940 was a mere 2 meters thick,which was the same as the thickness of February 2012. Source: RealScience,
1947 GeophysicistHans Ahlmann sets off the alarm: Climate change in the Arctic is sodramatic that an international agency needs to be set up to addressit. Source:Real Science, the reference frame.
1958 During avoyage in the summer of 1958, American submarine ”Skate“emerged in open water nine times – and once at the NorthPole. Source: Donner + Doria.
========================================Note: I translatedLüning’s and Vahrenholt’s text rather than seeking out theoriginal quotes, and so there may be some slight deviations from theoriginal.

Hiç yorum yok:

Yorum Gönder